On April 4th, the government of Curaçao and the government of the Netherlands signed an agreement. mutually, the so-called Onderlinge Regeling, which regulates cooperation between Curaçao and The Netherlands in the implementation of the Curaçao Landspakket. The agreement mutually mention three basic elements that guide cooperation between Curaçao and The Netherlands in implementing the reforms. These are the chief priests, Equality in common. What about finance minister drs. Silvania does nothing strange to create so much
The Netherlands has been criticized. Minister Silvania simply did his job as minister of Curaçao: demand and claim autonomy of Curaçao when it comes to our own affairs. The famous “Eigenaarschap” which stands in the Onderlinge Regeling. It is Curaçao’s Landpakket, so Curaçao should be the master in its execution
Land packages. It is necessary to reform Curaçao to achieve a balanced budget, a a strong economy and a healthy and efficient public apparatus.
Here we see the farce of the Onderlinge Regeling which is supposed to be a great achievement. By We start talking about equality, not equality. It’s about ownership and commonalities that are contradictory concepts. Curaçao presents itself as the presumed owner of the farm, whereas in practice the Netherlands is the owner of farms and the government of Curaçao the state and the union of sewing bombs of the people of Cut it out.
With great enthusiasm Minister President Pisas announced that the government has removed COHO from the table and reached a mutual agreement with the Netherlands. A mutual arrangement The Netherlands respects the autonomy of Curaçao. In the current mutual arrangement the Parliament is be completely excluded as was the case in COHO and in the mutual agreement
Signed on November 2, 2020. The state of Curaçao cannot bring any change even in contained in or on the way to the package.
Contrary to the COHO law, the current Onderlinge Regeling is not embedded in a royal law. Through article 38 paragraph 1 of the Statute the government and the government reach an agreement on how to Mutual support will work. All personal affairs are supposed to be in the hands of Curaçao does not become subject to the Kingdom ex Article 3 of the Statüt .
But what do we see in practice for how the Onderlinge works?
Current regulation signed by press Pisas and Sarra. What about Van Huffelen? The government of Curaçao has no the command. The implementation of every reform, project and measure is carried out by the instrument the newly created Pisas-Slot, the Prime Minister of Curaçao together with the Minister of Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (BZK) from the Netherlands.
In the new Onderlinge Regeling the two together form a perfect duo that manages everything about this “landspakket” in Curaçao. Mrs. Slot represents the Dutch government. He decides on behalf of the Netherlands and he has the bag of money in his hand. In the execution of the land package, Curaçao is obliged to give Slot all data, all information, all seals from Curaçao are the same as in COHO. If there is a disagreement between the Parties With the implementation of certain reforms, measures or projects in Curaçao the decision The final is not about Pisas who is the minister president of Curaçao.
A mediator is appointed to resolve the issue. If the parties cannot reach a mediator, the President of the Common Court decides who becomes the mediator. Even the Dutch authorities are still running our country.
In the current mutual arrangement, Parliament was also eliminated as in COHO. Parliament did not participate in the implementation of the Landpakket and Parliament cannot not make any changes to the Landpakket that is currently on the table.
Only Minister President Pisas and Minister Slot of BZK can change something in the Landspakket. The Parliament has only 10 days to take note of the changes and bring observations and objections. That is the sole right of parliament. The change will take place in exactly the same way that Pisa and Slot want. The state cannot say or block anything. You can clearly see that the Netherlands continues to impose what it wants to happen in Curaçao.
It is also obvious that our politicians work and govern in the interests of the Dutch. They are cooperating with three key points that are Dutch desires. These are primarily to make Curaçao a “stepping stone” for Dutch businesses, to make Curaçao a NATO military base and to help make the children of Curaçao poor by bringing the standard of living in Curaçao down to the ground for the Netherlands to develop its economy. Because capitalism and colonialism are good when there is poverty.
What the people of Curaçao, Aruba and Sint Maarten need to realize is that the Netherlands is in trouble to continue its colonial rule over its colonies in the Caribbean. Another element we see again in the new Onderlinge Regeling is manipulation with money, with experts and with Dutch experts.
The Netherlands provides financial support. This means, among other things, that if more Dutch experts are needed, the Netherlands brings them in. If the Dutch are needed to help execute the landspakket in Curaçao, the Netherlands brings them in. It doesn’t matter how many Dutch experts and managers you have to bring. Finally, Dutch architects think, create, design, monitor and implement all these measures, projects and reforms in Curaçao. They will make Curaçao part of Amsterdam in the Caribbean. The new Underlinge Regeling allows this.
Every Dutch dollar used to finance the implementation of the Curacao Landspakket will fall under the control of the Dutch law Algemene Wet Bestuursrecht. Control entities The SOAB and the Comptroller General have no authority.
The First Cause has always expressed opposition to Dutch rule and colonial settlement. On the curve. The problem is that politicians from Curaçao have internalized colonialism will always praise and adore the Netherlands and despise the son of Curaçao just like them.
They’ll keep on kneeling and holding hands and begging for Dutch favors and money. Now get out of here In terms of the laws of consensus we finally see some degree of resistance from a Mandatory son of Curaçao.
Minister Javier Silvania countered and resisted the suggestions of CFT and TWO. The attitude of Minister Silvania shows that the new Onderlinge Regeling does not respect the autonomy of Curaçao. Is the position of Silvania’s minister a new management or an incident?