On August 22 we saw the first round of the debate on the financing of the debt of the pandemic and the government’s position on the Raft. A lot has been said in this debate that it wasn’t But there were also some surprises. The only one who was pro-RAft like him It is, it is Mansur.
Independent MPs Gerlien and Ryçond flip-flop on the RAft Gerlien and Ryçond voiced their opposition to Raft when they were in the AVP, travelled to IPKO to fight the Raft, emerged as the green party that opposes Raft, Ryçond made recommendations officers to fight the RAft, and never rumored otherwise. Now suddenly both Parliamentarians left without explaining why they had changed their position on the RAft. Probably Because they didn’t have their own voice in the AVP, they had to bow their heads to Mike Eman and say, to do whatever he told them to do. Now, they want to go out and play independent politics.
together with Miguel Mansur that they are pro-RAft as they are, without justifying or explaining people Why did they change their minds on a law so shocking to our country. By colmo, then as coalition factions emerged stronger for flip-flop posture confrontations, they began to double down and say they also want to see changes in the RAft. More flip-flops from the two parliamentarians here.
Marisol and pro-Raft Gunn also flip-flopped on RAft
Marisol, the MAS leader who had requested this public meeting, was not present again. Fraction MAS expressed itself pro-Raft, as it is presented by the Netherlands in several occurrence. However, when the faction found itself in a heated debate during the meeting public on the subject, began to double and change positions. MAS stated that they also want see changes in the raft. However, it’s worth noting that neither Ryçond, Gerlien nor MAS have give no point that they want to see change in the RAft. What’s wrong with you? For now they must run They will think about it and write it down, because they have not spoken it. That happens when politicians are play a flip-flop policy.
No support for RAft in Parliament
Most states indicated that they would negotiate with the Netherlands, but that they would have to take it into account. points that were presented at IPKO. The state must be brought closer and closer. Parliament’s budget right cannot be removed. It may not be possible to duplicate Dutch cameras It now dictates what can and cannot be done with Aruba’s finances. That’s the seat of Parliament.
Most want to see what another Rijkswet will look like.
Coalition parliamentarians mentioned some points they want to see addressed condition mentioned in a rijkswet to be considered. Points to consider:
1) A low percentage for the loan;
2) A longer time to pay off the debt
3) An extended grace period,
4) The Netherlands can refinance our entire national debt at a lower rate,
5) We should be able to talk more about kwijtschelding in the future
6) Evaluation of current financial supervision,
7) Remove the RAft clause that does not allow for the investment of income savings in projects for the people. The current RAft will no longer be able to invest in our country. It can’t be like that Because the Dutch loaned us money to help us survive a pandemic, now they want come and impose a raft that will completely destroy our country.